Form DPT-3 explained: applicability, transactions reported, MCA V3 filing steps, 30 June 2026 due date, auditor certification, and non-filing penalties.
Overview of Form DPT-3
Form DPT-3 is the annual return every Indian company — barring government companies — must file with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) by 30 June 2026, disclosing all outstanding balances of money received that are not classified as deposits, plus any accepted deposits under Chapter V of the Companies Act, 2013. With the MCA V3 portal now running AI-assisted cross-validation against audited financials and Income Tax AIS data, a missed or inconsistent filing can trigger a Section 206 inquiry and expose your board to penalties ranging from scaled additional fees to disqualification. You have just over five weeks left to act.
Why DPT-3 Exists — the Legal Framework
Chapter V of the Companies Act, 2013 (Sections 73–76A) governs how companies accept money from the public and from related parties. Rule 16 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 requires every company to file a return of any deposits outstanding as on 31 March each year.
Rule 16A, inserted by the MCA in 2019, extended this obligation to cover receipts of money that are not classified as deposits — the category that covers the overwhelming majority of what most private companies carry on their balance sheets: director loans, inter-company borrowings, customer advances, and security deposits. These receipts are not "deposits" as defined under Rule 2(1)(c) of the Deposit Rules, but the law requires you to disclose them in Form DPT-3 annually.
In plain terms: if any money sits on your balance sheet on 31 March that was given to you by another party — regardless of whether it qualifies as a deposit — there is a very high probability that DPT-3 applies. The form is not just a deposit return. It is a comprehensive disclosure of external funding on your books.
Who Must File Form DPT-3
The filing obligation applies to:
- Private limited companies — including start-ups, wholly owned subsidiaries, and subsidiaries of foreign companies incorporated in India
- Public limited companies
- One Person Companies (OPCs)
- Section 8 companies (not-for-profit companies licensed under the Companies Act)
- Nidhi companies — subject to their own deposit regulations, but DPT-3 is not excluded
The only statutory exclusion: Government companies as defined under Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013 — companies in which not less than 51 per cent of paid-up share capital is held by the Central Government or one or more State Governments.
On nil returns: Many founders assume that if their company has no outstanding loans or borrowings, there is no obligation to file. The MCA's consistent administrative position is that a nil-disclosure return should still be filed. Silence is not read as nil by the MCA's analytics engine, and the absence of a filing creates a gap in the company's compliance history that can prompt future inquiry.
What Transactions Are Reported
Form DPT-3 has two distinct disclosure streams. Confusing or conflating them is the most common reason returns are flagged for review.
Stream 1 — Outstanding Deposits Under Chapter V (Rule 16)
If your company has actually accepted deposits within the meaning of Chapter V — for example, a public company has accepted deposits from shareholders or the public under a registered deposit scheme — those balances as on 31 March must be reported under this stream. Details required include the deposit scheme, tenure, rate of interest, and repayment schedule.
Very few private companies operate under this stream. If you are a private company and you have accepted money from members that exceeds the monetary threshold or lacks the required documentation, you may inadvertently be in this category — which is a serious compliance problem, not a filing nuance.
Stream 2 — Outstanding Receipts Not Classified as Deposits (Rule 16A)
This is the operative stream for the vast majority of Indian companies. Rule 2(1)(c) of the Deposit Rules lists categories of receipts that are excluded from the definition of "deposit." If you have received money in any of these categories and the balance is still outstanding at 31 March, the amount must be disclosed in DPT-3.
The following table covers the categories that routinely appear in practice:
| Category | What It Covers | Key Condition to Maintain Exemption |
|---|---|---|
| Director loans — Rule 2(1)(c)(viii) | Unsecured loans from directors of private companies | Director must file a written declaration, before funds are received, that the money is from own funds and not borrowed |
| Inter-corporate loans — Rule 2(1)(c)(xi) | Loans from holding, subsidiary, or associate companies | Related-party relationship must exist on the date of receipt |
| Commercial paper / listed debentures | CP, NCDs, bonds listed on recognised stock exchanges | Instrument must be listed; tenure and other SEBI conditions apply |
| Customer advances — Rule 2(1)(c)(xii) | Advances received against future supply of goods or services | Outstanding for not more than 365 days; if goods/services are not delivered within 365 days, exemption lapses |
| Security deposits — Rule 2(1)(c)(xiii) | Deposits from dealers, franchisees, and business agents | Received in the ordinary course of business under a written agreement |
| Employee deposits — Rule 2(1)(c)(xv) | Amounts received from employees under an employer-sponsored scheme | Scheme must comply with Rule 2(1)(c)(xv) requirements |
The director declaration trap — read this carefully: The Rule 2(1)(c)(viii) declaration must be dated and executed before the money is transferred to the company. A declaration produced after the fact — even by one day — is invalid. The ROC, in scrutiny proceedings, has held that a retrospective declaration does not cure a receipt that lacked documentation at the time it was made. Audit your declarations file against the actual bank credit dates, not just the loan ledger dates.
Customer advances that have aged past 365 days are a hidden liability for many manufacturing and trading companies. Finance teams routinely carry these as "advance from customers" in current liabilities without questioning whether the delivery timeline has expired. If it has, the advance no longer qualifies under Rule 2(1)(c)(xii) and may need to be reclassified as a potential deposit — a conversation that must happen with your statutory auditor before 31 March, not after.
DPT-3 Due Date and the 2026 Filing Window
| Financial Year | Balance Sheet Date | DPT-3 Due Date |
|---|---|---|
| FY 2025-26 | 31 March 2026 | 30 June 2026 |
| FY 2024-25 | 31 March 2025 | 30 June 2025 |
The MCA V3 portal typically opens Form DPT-3 for filing in mid-April each year, once master data for the new financial year is configured. As of May 2026, the form is live and accepting submissions.
The practical bottleneck is not the portal — it is getting the auditor's certificate. Your statutory auditor must complete the specific procedures engagement on loan balances and generate a UDIN before you can submit. Auditors are heavily loaded in June with finalisation of financial statements, audit reports, and other statutory filings. If you have not already initiated the DPT-3 certificate engagement, do so this week. Budget at least two to three weeks for the turnaround, including internal reconciliation, queries, and UDIN generation.
There is no official extension of the 30 June deadline announced for 2026 at the time of writing. Do not assume an extension will come. In recent years, the MCA has extended the DPT-3 deadline only when it is also extending other annual compliance deadlines broadly.
Auditor Certification: What the CA Does and What the Portal Checks
Form DPT-3 filed under Rule 16A requires a certificate from the statutory auditor — not a practising company secretary, not a practising CA unless they are the statutory auditor. This is a mandatory attachment; the portal will not allow submission without it.
What the auditor certifies
The auditor confirms that:
- The outstanding balances disclosed in Form DPT-3 agree with the company's books of account and audited (or in-progress) financial statements.
- The receipts claimed as non-deposits are supported by proper documentation — director declarations, board resolutions, loan agreements, and relationship proofs for inter-company borrowings.
- No receipt that ought to be classified as a deposit has been excluded from disclosure.
UDIN requirement
The auditor must generate a Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) on the ICAI UDIN portal for this specific certificate. The UDIN must be entered in Form DPT-3 at the time of submission. A certificate without a valid UDIN — or with a UDIN generated for a different document — is rejected by the MCA V3 portal at the validation stage.
Common auditor-side error: Some auditors generate the UDIN under the generic "Certificate" category when the correct category for a DPT-3 certificate is specific to the Companies Act attestation. Confirm with your auditor that the UDIN is categorised correctly before the upload.
How MCA V3 validates the return
The MCA's analytics engine cross-references DPT-3 figures against:
- MGT-7/7A (Annual Return) — borrowing disclosures and related-party transactions
- Financial statements filed with the ROC — Schedule III borrowings, other financial liabilities, and current liabilities
- Income Tax AIS/TIS data — TDS on interest paid, interest credited in 26AS
Where DPT-3 figures are materially inconsistent with any of these sources, the return is automatically flagged for Section 206 scrutiny — a formal inquiry that requires the company to respond within 15 days with reconciliation and supporting documents. Preparing that reconciliation in advance (before filing) is far less stressful than doing it under a deadline from the ROC.
Step-by-Step Filing Process on MCA V3
Here is the exact sequence on the MCA V3 portal as it stands in May 2026:
- Login to unknown node using the director's registered credentials. The director whose Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) will be used must have an active, non-disqualified DIN.
- Navigate to Dashboard → e-Filing → Company Forms → Deposit Related Forms → Form DPT-3.
- Enter the CIN. The portal auto-fetches company name, registered address, and the previous year's DPT-3 filing reference.
- Select the purpose of filing: Annual Return (most common), One-Time Return (transitional — rarely applicable after 2020), or Both.
- Fill in the schedule of outstanding amounts: category of receipt (select the relevant Rule 2(1)(c) exemption), name of lender/depositor, PAN of lender, date of original receipt, rate of interest, and balance outstanding as on 31 March 2026.
- Upload the auditor's certificate (PDF, maximum 4 MB) bearing the UDIN. Enter the UDIN in the designated field.
- Upload supporting attachments: board resolution authorising the filing, director declarations under Rule 2(1)(c)(viii) if applicable, and loan agreements or sanction letters for significant borrowings.
- DSC affixation: Two authorised signatories are required — typically a director and the company secretary (where appointed). For OPCs and small private companies without a CS, a practising professional may countersign subject to MCA guidelines.
- Click Submit. An SRN (Service Request Number) is generated immediately.
- Pay the filing fee via the integrated payment gateway. Fees scale with paid-up share capital and, for late filings, an additional fee multiplier applies per the MCA fee schedule.
- The email acknowledgement arrives within 15 minutes at the registered email address on MCA V3.
Retain the SRN receipt, payment challan, and the auditor's certificate for a minimum of seven years. These documents are your first line of defence in any future ROC inquiry.
Worked Example: Pinecone Manufacturing Private Limited
Company profile: Pinecone Manufacturing Private Limited; incorporated 2018; paid-up share capital Rs. 25 lakhs; two directors (also shareholders); no company secretary appointed.
Loan and advance ledger as on 31 March 2026:
| Item | Balance (Rs.) | Status of Documentation | DPT-3 Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unsecured loan from Director A | 55,00,000 | Declaration dated before funds received — on file | Reportable, correctly exempt from deposit classification |
| Unsecured loan from Director B | 20,00,000 | Declaration missing — never executed | Problem: reclassification risk |
| Loan from 100% holding company | 1,80,00,000 | Board resolution and loan agreement on file | Reportable, inter-corporate exemption applies |
| Customer advance — Batch Order #2024/11 | 12,00,000 | Goods not delivered; advance received Nov 2024 (>365 days) | Problem: exemption lapsed |
| Security deposit from distributor | 4,00,000 | Distribution agreement on file | Reportable, correctly exempt |
Total balance to be disclosed: Rs. 2,71,00,000
Scenario A — Filed correctly by 28 June 2026: Auditor issues certificate with UDIN. Director B's missing declaration is flagged in internal notes. The board passes a resolution requiring Director B to repay the loan or provide a valid declaration by 30 September 2026. The customer advance is disclosed and the auditor notes it as a potential irregular receipt. Normal MCA filing fee paid. Return accepted. ROC has a clean record.
Scenario B — Filed 50 days late on 19 August 2026: Additional MCA filing fee (as per the applicable late fee schedule for delays between 31 and 60 days) is payable. The ROC may initiate an inquiry notice under Section 206. Director B's Rs. 20 lakh loan — now disclosed months after the due date — is visible as an irregular receipt. If the ROC finds this constitutes a deposit accepted in contravention of Section 73, the company faces a minimum penalty of Rs. 1 crore under Section 73(3), and Director B as officer in default faces a fine of not less than Rs. 25 lakhs under Section 76A — all because a declaration form was never executed and a deadline was missed.
Scenario C — Never filed: The company is flagged on the MCA's active default database. All directors are at risk of disqualification under Section 164(2) if the default persists. The company becomes ineligible to file any subsequent forms (including share allotments, charge registrations, and annual returns) until DPT-3 is filed with compounding fees.
Common Mistakes and Pitfalls to Avoid
Assuming zero obligation because "we have no deposits"
The Rule 16A obligation covers non-deposit receipts — exactly what a company with no public deposits still has. Every company with outstanding director loans, holding-company borrowings, or unadjusted advances must file.
Backdated or missing director declarations
This single documentation failure converts a clean loan into a potentially illegal deposit. Conduct a declaration audit against bank statement credit dates — not just against the loan ledger — every year before 31 March.
Customer advances ageing past 365 days
The Rule 2(1)(c)(xii) exemption for advances lapses at 365 days if delivery has not occurred. Flag all advances older than 10 months to your CFO and auditor. Either ensure delivery or reclassify and seek legal advice on regularisation.
UDIN mismatch or wrong document category
Auditors who generate a UDIN under the wrong attestation category will have the upload rejected at the portal validation stage. Confirm the UDIN is for the DPT-3 certificate specifically.
Carrying forward last year's figures without fresh reconciliation
New borrowings received, repayments made, reclassifications, and changes in related-party status all affect the DPT-3 schedule. Copying last year's data with only interest adjustments will produce a mismatched return that the MCA's cross-validation engine will flag.
DSC expiry discovered on the day of filing
Check the expiry date of all signing directors' DSCs at least three weeks before 30 June. Renewal takes three to seven working days and requires physical verification in some cases. A last-day DSC failure is entirely avoidable.
Omitting Section 8 companies or OPCs from the compliance calendar
Finance teams at Section 8 companies sometimes believe their not-for-profit status creates exemptions. It does not — DPT-3 applies. Similarly, OPCs with director loans frequently miss this return.
Penalties for Non-Filing or Late Filing
The consequence structure operates in two layers.
Layer 1 — Additional MCA portal fees
The MCA charges an additional fee for filings received after the due date, scaled by the number of days of delay. These fees are based on the company's authorised share capital and the delay bracket (less than 30 days, 31–60 days, 61–90 days, 91–180 days, beyond 180 days), as per the MCA fee schedule notified under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules. They are non-negotiable and non-waivable through the portal.
Layer 2 — Statutory penalties under the Companies Act
Where the ROC initiates adjudication proceedings for non-filing, incorrect disclosure, or underlying irregularities uncovered through DPT-3 scrutiny:
- On the company under Section 73(3): fine not less than Rs. 1 crore or twice the amount of the irregular receipt, whichever is lower, and which may extend to Rs. 10 crore.
- On every officer in default under Section 76A: imprisonment which may extend to 7 years, and a fine not less than Rs. 25 lakhs which may extend to Rs. 2 crores.
- Director disqualification under Section 164(2): directors of a company that has committed certain filing defaults may be disqualified from acting as director of any company for five years.
The path from "we forgot to file DPT-3" to "Rs. 1 crore penalty" is shorter than most boards realise. Non-filing triggers an MCA inquiry, the inquiry examines underlying loan documentation, and missing declarations or irregular advances produce findings that activate the heavier penalty provisions. The DPT-3 itself is disclosure — it is what happens when that disclosure is absent or incorrect that creates the real risk.
Key Takeaways
- Every company except a government company must file Form DPT-3 by 30 June 2026 for FY 2025-26 closing balances — including companies that have no public deposits.
- Both deposit and non-deposit receipts are reportable. Most private companies file under Rule 16A (non-deposit receipts); the relevant exemptions under Rule 2(1)(c) must be supported by documentation, not just claimed.
- Director loan declarations are the most common failure point. A missing or backdated Rule 2(1)(c)(viii) declaration can reclassify a clean loan as an illegal deposit, triggering penalties starting at Rs. 1 crore on the company.
- The statutory auditor's certificate with a valid UDIN is mandatory. Engage your auditor immediately — June is peak season, and late engagement leads to late filing.
- MCA V3 cross-validates DPT-3 against MGT-7, audited financials, and Income Tax AIS/TIS data. Inconsistencies in reported borrowing figures are automatically flagged for Section 206 scrutiny.
- Customer advances older than 365 days without delivery lose their non-deposit exemption. Identify these before 31 March each year, not after.
- Non-filing compounds quickly: additional portal fees, ROC inquiry, director disqualification risk, and potential Section 76A penalties — delay carries no upside and significant downside.





