Loans and Investments by Companies — Section 185 and 186 Explained

Loans and Investments by Companies — Section 185 and Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013

Picture this. Your company has healthy reserves, and a fellow director needs a personal loan, or your group company wants to invest in a subsidiary short on working capital. Sounds simple, right? Except it isn't. The Companies Act, 2013 has two specific provisions — Section 185 and Section 186 — that decide exactly when, how, and how much a company can lend, guarantee, or invest.

Most directors and CFOs discover these sections the hard way, usually when an auditor flags a transaction or the Registrar of Companies sends a notice. This guide breaks down both sections in plain language, so you know what your company can and cannot do before you sign that cheque.

What are Sections 185 and 186

Section 185 and Section 186 both deal with how a company uses its funds outside its own operations, but they cover different territory.

Section 185 covers loans, guarantees, and security given to directors and people or entities connected to directors — the "insider" provision. The default position is restrictive: companies generally cannot give loans to their own directors or to entities in which directors are interested, except in a few defined situations. This exists because related-party lending is one of the easiest ways for company funds to be misused by the very people meant to protect them.

Section 186 is broader. It governs loans, guarantees, security, and investments a company makes to or in other bodies corporate or persons generally — not just directors. Unlike Section 185, the default here is permissive: such transactions are allowed, but only within prescribed limits and after a defined approval process involving the board and, in some cases, shareholders.

In short: Section 185 asks "is this going to an insider?" and mostly says no unless an exception applies. Section 186 asks "how much, and through what process?" and generally says yes, provided you follow the rules on limits, disclosure, and approvals.

Before your company advances any loan, gives any guarantee, offers security, or makes an investment, identify which section (or both) applies, because the compliance path differs completely.

Why It Matters

These sections protect company funds and shareholder value from being quietly diverted by the people who run the company.

Without Section 185, a director could route company money to themselves, a relative, or a firm they control, dressed up as a "loan," leaving shareholders and creditors with little recourse. Section 185 closes that door by allowing only narrow, defined exceptions.

Section 186 matters because companies — especially in group structures — routinely lend to or invest in other entities, including subsidiaries, joint ventures, or associates. Without a boundary, reserves could be stretched across multiple entities without shareholders knowing the scale of exposure. Section 186 keeps this transparent through board approval, shareholder approval beyond limits, and disclosure.

For group and holding-subsidiary structures, this is a daily reality — intercompany loans, corporate guarantees for subsidiary borrowings, and investments in step-down subsidiaries all need checking against Section 186 limits.

For startups sitting on investor money, founders sometimes assume that because the money is "in the company," it can move freely between group entities or fund directors informally. That assumption leads to compliance notices later. Non-compliance can trigger monetary penalties on the company and its officers, and personal liability for directors who authorised the transaction. During fundraising or due diligence, unresolved Section 185/186 issues are a common red flag that slows down or kills a deal.

When It Applies / Conditions

Section 185 applies when:

• A loan, guarantee, or security is proposed for a director of the company or its holding company.
• The recipient is a partner or relative of a director.
• The recipient is a firm in which a director or their relative is a partner.
• The recipient is a private company where a director is a director or member, or a body corporate where directors hold significant stake or control, or whose board acts on the directions of the director or company's board.

Exceptions under Section 185:

• Loans to a managing or whole-time director under a scheme approved by shareholders, or as conditions of service extended to all employees.
• Loans by a company whose ordinary business is lending money (such as an NBFC), at an interest rate not lower than the prescribed rate — verify the current benchmark with a professional, since it is tied to government security yields and can be revised.
• Loans to a wholly-owned subsidiary, or guarantee/security for a loan from a bank or financial institution to a wholly-owned subsidiary, provided funds are used for its principal business activities.
• Certain guarantees or security given by a holding company for a loan to its subsidiary, subject to conditions tied to the subsidiary's principal business activities.

Section 186 applies when:

• A company gives any loan to any person or body corporate.
• A company gives a guarantee or security for a loan to any person or body corporate.
• A company acquires securities of another body corporate — i.e., makes an investment.

Section 186 imposes a general ceiling: without shareholder special resolution, a company cannot extend loans, guarantees, securities, and investments beyond a limit tied to paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account, as prescribed under the Act (subject to specified limits, or a higher limit approved by shareholders). Within this limit, a unanimous board resolution is mandatory — a simple majority is not enough. Beyond the limit, a shareholder special resolution is additionally required.

Section 186 also restricts the number of layers of investment companies, to prevent complex structures from obscuring the use of funds. If a term loan from a public financial institution is subsisting, prior approval is required before fresh loans, guarantees, or investments, unless the proposed amount stays within already-sanctioned limits.

Documents & Approvals Required

• Board resolution passed unanimously at a validly convened, quorate meeting — mandatory for Section 186 transactions and for permitted Section 185 exceptions.
• Special resolution of shareholders, with an explanatory statement, where the transaction exceeds Section 186 limits, or where an MD/WTD loan scheme is being approved.
• Disclosure in financial statements — full particulars in the notes to accounts, as required.
• Register in Form MBP-2, updated at each transaction and open for inspection by members.
• Prior approval of the public financial institution, in writing, where a term loan is subsisting and the transaction isn't within sanctioned limits.
• Declaration on interest rate, confirming it is not lower than the prevailing government security yield on the transaction date — verify the current benchmark with a professional.

Keeping documentation ready before the transaction, not after, separates smooth compliance from a scramble during the next audit.

Step-by-step Process & Forms

1. Identify the recipient — director/connected person (Section 185) or other body corporate/person (Section 186). Some transactions need checking against both.
2. Check Section 185 exceptions — approved MD/WTD scheme, ordinary-course lending, or wholly-owned subsidiary exemption. If none applies, the transaction cannot proceed.
3. Compute exposure against Section 186 limits — paid-up capital, free reserves, securities premium, and headroom before the prescribed limit is breached.
4. Convene a board meeting and pass a resolution — unanimous for Section 186 matters.
5. If beyond the limit, convene a general meeting and pass a special resolution with an explanatory statement.
6. Obtain prior financial institution approval, in writing, if a term loan is subsisting.
7. Disclose the transaction in financial statements for the relevant year.
8. Update the Form MBP-2 register immediately after the transaction.
9. File the special resolution in Form MGT-14 with the ROC, where applicable, within the statutory timeline.
10. Retain records — minutes, resolutions, explanatory statement, approvals, and interest computation — for audit purposes.

Cost, Fees & Penalties 2026

Professional costs vary with complexity — expect a few thousand to a few tens of thousands of rupees for straightforward board-resolution-only cases, rising where a special resolution, financial institution approval, or multi-layer group review is involved. Ongoing costs — MBP-2 maintenance, disclosure checks, interest benchmarking — are typically bundled into a secretarial retainer. Always get a specific quote rather than relying on generic estimates.

The Act prescribes monetary penalties on the company and officers in default for Section 185 contravention, extending to imprisonment for wilful default involving fraud. Section 186 contraventions similarly attract fines. These amounts have been revised before and can change again — verify current penalty amounts with a professional.

The real cost of non-compliance is often larger than the fine:

• Personal liability of directors who authorised a non-compliant transaction.
• Repayment demands — recall of a loan or investment made in contravention.
• Reputational damage during fundraising or due diligence.
• Auditor qualifications, affecting banking relationships and investor confidence.
• Time cost of retrospective compliance through compounding applications, far slower than getting it right upfront.

Timeline

Board approval, once documentation is ready, can typically be completed the same day, since a board meeting can be convened quickly with proper notice.

Where a shareholder special resolution is required, standard notice applies — typically 21 clear days for an AGM or EGM, unless shorter notice is consented to by the requisite majority. Factor this into planning for time-sensitive transactions.

Financial institution approval, where required, can take a few days to a few weeks depending on the institution's process. Initiate this well in advance.

Filing Form MGT-14 with the ROC must happen within the statutory timeline from the resolution date — delays attract additional fees. Verify current timelines with a professional before finalising your calendar.

Section 185 vs Section 186 — Key Distinctions

• Who is covered: Section 185 covers directors, their relatives, partners, firms, and connected bodies corporate. Section 186 covers any body corporate or person generally, including subsidiaries and group companies.
• Default position: Section 185 is prohibitive unless an exception applies. Section 186 is permissive within limits, approvals, and disclosure.
• Approval needed: Section 185 relies on a shareholder-approved MD/WTD scheme or a statutory exception. Section 186 always needs unanimous board approval, plus a special resolution beyond the prescribed limit.
• Rate of interest condition: Applies mainly under Section 186, and also to the ordinary-course-lending exception under Section 185.
• Purpose: Section 185 prevents insider abuse; Section 186 regulates general intercorporate financial commitments, keeping them transparent and proportionate.
• Overlap: A transaction can trigger both — for example, a guarantee for a subsidiary loan where a director also controls the subsidiary. Clearing one section does not automatically clear the other.

Common Mistakes

• Treating a director's relative or associate firm as outside Section 185 scope — the restriction covers relatives, partners, firms, and connected bodies corporate too.
• Obtaining only partial board approval — Section 186 requires unanimity; a majority vote with dissent does not satisfy this.
• Exceeding limits without a special resolution — proceeding on board approval alone without checking the shareholder-sanction threshold.
• Not checking the layers of investment companies restriction — multi-layer group structures can inadvertently breach the cap.
• Not maintaining the Form MBP-2 register — often overlooked until an audit reveals the gap.
• Ignoring the financial institution's prior consent requirement when a term loan is subsisting.
• Incorrect interest rate benchmarking — using an outdated rate instead of the current prescribed benchmark.
• Assuming subsidiary loans are automatically exempt — the wholly-owned subsidiary exception has conditions attached.
• Delaying documentation until year-end, sometimes with backdated paperwork, which compounds rather than solves the problem.

FAQ

Can a company give a loan to its director?

Generally, no — Section 185 restricts loans, guarantees, or security to directors or connected persons, permitted only through specific exceptions like a shareholder-approved MD/WTD scheme or an NBFC's ordinary lending business. Check applicability with a professional before proceeding.

Can a private company lend money to its subsidiary?

Yes, subject to conditions. Loans to a wholly-owned subsidiary can qualify for a Section 185 exception, and must also satisfy Section 186 limits and approval process, with funds typically used for the subsidiary's principal business activities.

What is the limit under Section 186?

The Act prescribes a limit tied to paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account, or a higher limit approved by special resolution. Since exact figures can be amended, verify the current limit with a professional.

Is shareholder approval always needed for Section 186 transactions?

No. A unanimous board resolution is mandatory for every transaction, but shareholder special resolution is needed only when the transaction, combined with existing exposure, exceeds the prescribed limit.

What is Form MBP-2?

It is the statutory register companies must maintain to record particulars of loans, guarantees, security, and investments under Section 186, kept updated and available for inspection at the registered office.

What happens if a term loan from a bank is subsisting?

Prior approval of that institution is generally required before extending fresh loans, guarantees, or investments, unless the new transaction stays within already-sanctioned limits.

Are there exceptions for wholly-owned subsidiaries?

Yes. Loans to a wholly-owned subsidiary, and guarantees or security for its bank loans, can be exempted from Section 185, provided funds are used for its principal business activities and other conditions are met.

What is the penalty for violation of Section 185 or 186?

The Act prescribes monetary penalties on the company and officers in default, with imprisonment possible for wilful contravention. Since amounts have been revised before, verify the current penalty structure with a professional.

Do these sections apply to private companies too?

Yes, both sections apply broadly across company types, though relaxations may exist for specified classes of private companies subject to conditions. Confirm your company's eligibility with a professional, as conditions are updated periodically.

How Legal Suvidha Makes This Effortless

This is exactly the kind of process where one wrong document, a mismatched detail, or a missed deadline turns into a rejection, a resubmission, or a running penalty. Legal Suvidha handles the whole thing end-to-end so you can focus on your business.

• Fixed, all-inclusive price quoted upfront — professional fee plus government fee, itemised, with no hidden charges appearing later.
• A dedicated Chartered Accountant / Company Secretary who owns your case from the first call to the final certificate.
• Proactive updates and deadline alerts at every stage — we do not disappear after payment.
• Trusted by 10,000+ founders with a 4.9/5 rating and a multi-disciplinary team of CAs, CSs and lawyers.

Talk to a Legal Suvidha expert today for a free consultation and an exact, transparent quote on WhatsApp — and get it done right the first time.