Section 73 of Companies Act 2013 Explained: Acceptance of Deposits by Companies

Section 73 of Companies Act 2013 Explained: Acceptance of Deposits by Companies

If you run a private limited company and someone has offered to lend the business money informally — a director, a relative, or even a friendly investor — you need to know about Section 73 before you accept a single rupee. This section of the Companies Act, 2013 is one of the most misunderstood parts of Indian company law, and getting it wrong can mean serious penalties for the company and its officers.

In this guide, we break down what Section 73 actually says, who it applies to, what counts as a "deposit," what is exempt, and how the annual DPT-3 filing fits into the picture. The goal is to give you a clear, practical understanding — not legal jargon — so you can stay compliant while running your business.

What Section 73 says (plain English)

Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the "Prohibition on Acceptance of Deposits from Public." In simple terms, it says that no company can invite, accept, or renew deposits from the public unless it follows a very specific process laid out in the Act and the accompanying Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules.

The general rule is a prohibition — companies are not allowed to freely borrow money from the public by calling it a "deposit." There are two broad exceptions built into the section:

1. Banking companies, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), and certain other classes of companies notified by the government are allowed to accept deposits in the ordinary course of their business, subject to guidelines from the Reserve Bank of India or the relevant regulator.
2. A company that is not one of the above (essentially a normal private or public company) may accept deposits only from its own members, and only after satisfying a long list of conditions — passing a resolution, issuing a circular, maintaining a deposit repayment reserve, obtaining credit ratings in certain cases, and creating security if applicable.

The intent behind Section 73 is investor protection. In the years before the 2013 Act, several companies collected public money labeled as "deposits" or "advances" and then failed to repay, causing large-scale financial harm to ordinary depositors. Section 73, along with Section 74 and 76, was designed to close that gap.

It's important to note that many everyday transactions in a business — share capital received, loans from directors in specific circumstances, security deposits from employees, advances for goods and services — may or may not qualify as "deposits" depending on how they are structured. This is precisely why the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 carve out a detailed list of exempt categories. Because these categories and their conditions are updated periodically, always verify the current provision and rules before deciding whether a transaction is a deposit or an exempt receipt.

Who it applies to

Section 73 applies broadly to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013 — private limited companies, public limited companies, and one person companies — with special carve-outs for banking companies, NBFCs, and housing finance companies that are separately regulated.

In practice, this section is most relevant to:

• Startups and small private companies that receive informal funding from directors, relatives of directors, or shareholders and need to determine whether that money counts as a "deposit" under the rules.
• Private companies raising money from members through a formal deposit scheme, which is allowed only if strict conditions are met.
• Companies that receive advances, security deposits, or trade credit in the normal course of business, where the classification (deposit vs. non-deposit) affects compliance obligations.
• NBFCs and banks, which are largely governed by RBI regulations rather than the Companies Act deposit rules, though they still interact with this framework at a structural level.

If your company has never taken any deposits, loans from directors, or advances outside normal trade transactions, Section 73 may still apply to you indirectly — because every company, regardless of whether it holds deposits, is generally required to file an annual return (Form DPT-3) confirming its position on deposits and exempt deposits. This makes Section 73 relevant to virtually every registered company in India, not just those actively raising deposit funding.

Key provisions and requirements

Section 73 and the rules framed under it lay out a detailed compliance framework. Some of the key elements include:

• General prohibition: A company cannot invite or accept deposits from the public unless it complies with the section's conditions or falls under an exempted category.

• Deposits from members: A company (other than a specified class of private companies eligible for exemption) may accept deposits from its own members if it complies with conditions such as:

- Passing a resolution in a general meeting.

- Issuing a circular to members including a statement of the company's financial position, credit rating (where applicable), and the number of depositors and amounts due.

- Filing the circular with the Registrar of Companies before issuing it to members.

- Depositing a certain sum in a scheduled bank as a deposit repayment reserve before accepting or renewing deposits, in a separate account, which cannot be used for purposes other than repayment.

- Providing deposit insurance in certain cases, where applicable under current rules.

- Certifying that the company has not defaulted in repayment of deposits or interest.

- Creating a charge or security for the deposits and interest, where required.

• Exempt deposits: Certain receipts are excluded from the definition of "deposit" altogether under the Deposit Rules — for example, amounts received from the government, from other companies, as share application money pending allotment (subject to timelines), as a loan from a director (subject to conditions on the source of funds), amounts received in the ordinary course of business such as security deposits or advance for supply of goods and services, and a few other categories. Because this exempt list and its conditions change periodically, always verify the current Deposit Rules before treating a receipt as exempt.

• DPT-3 filing: Every company (other than government companies), whether or not it has accepted deposits, is generally required to file Form DPT-3 annually with the Registrar of Companies, reporting details of deposits and also "particulars of transactions by a company not considered as deposit." This is one of the most commonly missed compliance requirements by small companies, because many founders assume the filing only applies if they have actually taken deposits.

• Repayment obligations: If a company has accepted deposits, it must repay them along with any interest due, as per the terms agreed, and maintain proper records.

• Register of deposits: Companies accepting deposits are required to maintain a register containing prescribed particulars of depositors and deposits.

Given how detailed and frequently amended these rules are, it is wise to have your compliance team review any inflow of funds — especially from directors, relatives, or shareholders — before you assume it is automatically outside the scope of Section 73.

Practical example

Consider a private limited company, "BrightTech Solutions Pvt Ltd," where the promoter's father lends the company a sum of money to help with working capital during a slow quarter. The founders assume this is a simple, informal loan and record it as an "unsecured loan" in the books.

Under Section 73 and the Deposit Rules, a loan from a director may be exempt from being classified as a "deposit" — but only if specific conditions are met, such as the director furnishing a declaration that the money is not being funded out of borrowings and the company disclosing the loan in its Board's report. A loan from the director's father (who is not himself a director) would need to be examined more carefully, because it does not automatically fall into the "loan from a director" exemption. Depending on the facts, this could be treated as a deposit, and if the company hasn't complied with the resolution, circular, and reserve requirements under Section 73, this could trigger a violation.

This is a common real-world scenario — money flows into a company from family members, friends, or informal investors, and nobody checks whether it falls into an exempt category or a regulated "deposit" category. The safe approach is always to classify every inflow correctly at the time it is received, not months later when a filing deadline forces a review.

Compliance and filing implications

The core ongoing compliance obligations tied to Section 73 include:

• Annual DPT-3 filing: Most companies must file this return annually, reporting outstanding loans, receivables, and deposits (or confirming a nil position), along with an auditor's certificate in certain cases. Since the exact due date and applicability criteria are amended from time to time, always verify the current timeline with your compliance advisor.
• Board and shareholder resolutions: Any acceptance of deposits from members requires prior resolutions and, in some cases, special resolutions and government approval depending on the amount and the company's paid-up capital and reserves.
• Maintaining the deposit repayment reserve account: Companies accepting deposits must maintain the reserve account as prescribed and cannot use it for unrelated purposes.
• Disclosure in financial statements and Board's report: Details of deposits accepted, outstanding, and any default in repayment must typically be disclosed in the company's financial statements and the directors' report.
• Register maintenance: A register of deposits must be kept updated and available for inspection.

Because DPT-3 applies even to companies with no deposits (as a "nil" or exempt-transaction return in many cases), this is one of the compliance items founders most often overlook — and one where professional help pays for itself by avoiding late fees and notices.

Penalties for non-compliance

The Companies Act prescribes penalties for companies and officers who accept deposits in contravention of Section 73, and separately for failure to repay deposits (dealt with under Section 74) or for deposit-related fraud (Section 76A). These can include monetary penalties on the company and on every officer in default, and in serious cases involving fraudulent acceptance of deposits, the consequences can extend to imprisonment for the persons responsible.

Because penalty amounts, caps, and the exact structure of fines have been revised over the years — including through the decriminalization and re-categorization of several company law offences — we deliberately avoid quoting specific figures here. Please verify the current penalty provisions under Sections 73, 74, and 76A, and the applicable rules, with a qualified professional before relying on any number you see online.

Non-compliance can also lead to the Registrar of Companies flagging the company, difficulties in future fundraising or bank credit, and reputational damage with investors who conduct due diligence before investing.

Recent changes to note

The deposit rules under the Companies Act have been amended multiple times since 2014 — covering the list of exempt deposits, the definition of "deposit," the conditions for loans from directors, the deposit insurance requirement, and DPT-3 filing timelines and formats. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs also periodically issues clarifications on borderline cases, such as advances for services, convertible notes, and inter-corporate deposits.

Given this pace of change, please verify the latest amendments to Section 73 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules before making a compliance decision. A quick check with a professional advisor before accepting any large sum of money — whether from a director, a relative, or a third party — is far cheaper than dealing with a compliance notice later.

Common mistakes

• Assuming a loan from a relative or friend is automatically exempt just because it did not come from the general public. Exemptions have specific conditions attached.
• Forgetting to file DPT-3 because the company believes the filing is only required when deposits have actually been accepted.
• Not maintaining the deposit repayment reserve when deposits are accepted from members, which is a mandatory condition, not a best practice.
• Mislabeling deposits as "unsecured loans" or "advances" in the books without checking whether the substance of the transaction makes it a deposit under the rules.
• Ignoring director loan conditions, such as the declaration that funds are not borrowed, which is required for the exemption to apply.
• Missing the resolution and circular requirements before accepting deposits from members, treating it as a mere internal decision rather than a formal statutory process.
• Not updating the register of deposits even when deposits are accepted and remain outstanding.

FAQ

What is considered a "deposit" under Section 73?

Broadly, any receipt of money by a company that is not specifically excluded under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules can be treated as a deposit. This includes many types of loans and advances unless they fall within an exempted category such as loans from directors meeting prescribed conditions, share application money within timelines, or amounts received in the ordinary course of business.

Can a private company accept deposits from the public?

Generally, no. Section 73 restricts most companies from accepting deposits from the public. A company can typically accept deposits only from its own members, and only after complying with the resolution, circular, reserve, and other conditions prescribed under the rules — unless it is a company specifically eligible for an exemption, or is a banking company or NBFC governed by separate regulations.

Is a loan from a director always exempt from being a deposit?

Not automatically. A loan from a director can be exempt, but typically only if conditions such as a declaration from the director confirming the funds are not sourced from borrowings are satisfied, and the company discloses the loan appropriately. Please verify the current conditions, since they are amended periodically.

Do all companies need to file DPT-3, even with no deposits?

In most cases, yes — companies are generally required to file an annual return in Form DPT-3 disclosing deposits or specifying that certain receipts are not deposits, even if the company has never accepted deposits in the traditional sense. Always confirm current applicability with your compliance advisor.

What happens if a company accepts deposits without following Section 73?

The company and its officers in default can face monetary penalties, and if deposits are accepted fraudulently or not repaid, the consequences can be more severe, including provisions dealing with deposit repayment defaults and fraud under related sections. Exact penalty figures should be verified from the current Act since these are periodically revised.

Does Section 73 apply to One Person Companies (OPCs) and small companies?

Yes, in principle, Section 73 and the Deposit Rules apply to all companies registered under the Act, though certain classes of private companies may have specific eligibility for limited exemptions under the rules. It is best to check the current eligibility criteria for your company's classification.

Are advances received from customers treated as deposits?

Advances received in the ordinary course of business, such as advance payment for goods or services to be supplied or provided within a reasonable period, are typically excluded from the definition of deposit — but only if they meet the specific conditions and timelines under the rules. If the advance is not adjusted within the prescribed period, it may be reclassified as a deposit.

How often should a company review its deposit compliance position?

Ideally, every time the company receives a loan, advance, or similar inflow of funds, and at least once a year before the DPT-3 filing deadline, so that all transactions are correctly classified and documented in time.

Legal Suvidha's compliance team handles this end-to-end.

Why Founders Choose Legal Suvidha

For 14 years we have taken founders end-to-end — from choosing the right structure and incorporating, to first-year compliance, funding readiness, and ongoing ROC/GST/tax filings — so you never have to switch providers as you grow.

• One team for the whole journey — start, launch, post-launch and every annual filing after.
• Fixed, all-inclusive pricing — professional plus government fees itemised, no hidden charges.
• A dedicated CA/CS who owns your case and does not disappear after payment.
• 6,000+ founders served, 4.9/5 rating, DPIIT-recognised, 100% online.

Talk to a Legal Suvidha expert today for a free consultation and an exact, transparent quote on WhatsApp (8130645164).