LatestLegal Updates 11 August 2026
Cross-Examination Ruling
The Supreme Court has reversed a High Court order, allowing a defendant to cross-examine a plaintiff on brand name usage even if a written statement is not on record. This decision highlights the importance of cross-examination in civil cases and ensures that defendants have the right to question plaintiffs on all relevant matters, including brand name usage.
The Supreme Court has made a significant ruling in a civil case, allowing a defendant to *cross-examine* a plaintiff on brand name usage. The key points of this ruling include:
- The defendant is entitled to cross-examine the plaintiff even if a written statement is not on record.
- The High Court's order to expunge the cross-examination question was reversed.
- This decision ensures that defendants have the right to question plaintiffs on all relevant matters, including brand name usage.
For more information on this ruling, visit the original source article.
Need help understanding this update?
Connect with our domain experts instantly via WhatsApp for customized legal guidance.