Section 90 of Companies Act 2013 Explained: Significant Beneficial Owner (SBO) Rules

Section 90 of Companies Act 2013 Explained: Significant Beneficial Owner (SBO) Rules

Ever wondered why your company secretary suddenly started asking shareholders to declare who "really" owns or controls the company, beyond what's shown in the share register? That's Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 at work — a provision designed to peel back layers of holding structures and identify the real individuals who ultimately control a company.

Section 90 has become increasingly important as regulators worldwide push for transparency in company ownership, especially to prevent money laundering, shell company misuse, and benami holding structures. In this article, we explain what Section 90 requires, who counts as a Significant Beneficial Owner (SBO), how the BEN-1 and BEN-2 forms work, and what your company needs to do to stay compliant.

What Section 90 says (plain English)

Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the "Register of Significant Beneficial Owners in a Company." At its core, it requires every individual who is a "significant beneficial owner" in a company to declare their interest, and it requires the company to maintain a register of such owners and, in turn, report this to the Registrar of Companies.

The underlying idea is simple: sometimes the person whose name appears in the share register is not the real economic owner or controller of the shares. Shares may be held through trusts, partnership firms, other companies, or nominees, on behalf of someone else. Section 90, along with the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, requires that this "real" person — the significant beneficial owner — be identified and disclosed, even if their name does not appear directly in the company's register of members.

In simple terms, a significant beneficial owner is generally an individual who, acting alone or together with others, holds indirect (or a mix of direct and indirect) rights or entitlements in the company above a prescribed threshold of shares, voting rights, or dividend rights, or who otherwise exercises significant influence or control over the company, and whose name is not directly reflected as the registered holder of those rights. The precise threshold and the detailed tests for "significant influence or control" are laid out in the SBO Rules and have been amended over time, so always verify the current threshold and criteria before making a declaration.

Who it applies to

Section 90 applies to companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 — this generally includes private limited companies, public limited companies, and one person companies — with certain exemptions carved out for specific categories such as some government-controlled entities and investment vehicles regulated by SEBI or RBI in specified circumstances.

This is particularly relevant to:

• Companies with layered or complex shareholding, where shares are held by other companies, LLPs, trusts, partnership firms, or pooled investment vehicles rather than by individuals directly.
• Startups with holding company structures, especially where a foreign holding entity or an Indian holding company owns shares in the operating company.
• Family-owned businesses where shares are held in the name of a family trust or a holding entity, but actual control rests with specific family members.
• Companies backed by venture capital or private equity funds, where the fund structure may have layers of general partners, trustees, or investment managers that need to be traced back to individuals.
• Every company's own compliance team, since even if there is no complex ownership at all, the company must still assess and, where applicable, file a declaration confirming whether it has any SBOs.

If your company has a simple structure with individual shareholders holding shares directly and no chain of intermediate entities, you may not have any SBOs to report — but the assessment itself still needs to be done and documented so that you can show you checked.

Key provisions and requirements

The SBO framework under Section 90 and the SBO Rules involves several linked obligations:

• Identification of SBOs: The company must identify individuals who qualify as significant beneficial owners based on the prescribed thresholds of shareholding, voting rights, dividend entitlement, or the exercise of significant influence or control, whether held directly or through a chain of other entities.

• Declaration in Form BEN-1: Every individual identified as an SBO is required to file a declaration in Form BEN-1 to the company, disclosing their interest and the nature of that interest.

• Company's return in Form BEN-2: Once the company receives a BEN-1 declaration, it must file Form BEN-2 with the Registrar of Companies within the prescribed timeline, reporting the details of the significant beneficial owner.

• Register of Significant Beneficial Owners: The company is required to maintain a register containing the particulars of each SBO, and this register must be kept at the registered office and made available for inspection as prescribed.

• Notice to members (Form BEN-4): If the company has reasonable cause to believe that a person holds significant beneficial ownership but has not made the required declaration, the company can issue a notice seeking this information from the member or any other person it believes has the relevant knowledge.

• Application to the Tribunal: If a person fails to provide the required information or provides unsatisfactory information after the company's notice, the company may apply to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to restrict the rights attached to the relevant shares, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, until compliance is achieved.

• Exemptions: Certain categories of shareholding — for instance, shares held directly by an individual in their own name without any indirect holding or control arrangement — do not require an SBO declaration, since there is no beneficial owner different from the registered owner in such cases.

Because the thresholds (such as the percentage of shares, voting rights, or dividend rights that trigger SBO status) and the definition of "significant influence or control" are technical and have been refined through amendments and clarifications, always verify the current SBO Rules and any Ministry of Corporate Affairs circulars before concluding whether an individual is or isn't an SBO.

Practical example

Suppose "Zenith Innovations Pvt Ltd" is owned as follows: 60% of its shares are held by "Zenith Holdings Pte Ltd," a Singapore-based holding company, and the remaining 40% is held directly by two Indian individual founders. Zenith Holdings Pte Ltd, in turn, is wholly owned by one individual, Mr. Arjun Mehta, who is based in Singapore.

On the face of the share register, Zenith Innovations' shareholder is "Zenith Holdings Pte Ltd" — a corporate entity, not an individual. But Section 90 requires the company to look through this holding structure. Since Mr. Arjun Mehta ultimately controls the shares held by Zenith Holdings (assuming his indirect holding crosses the prescribed threshold), he would likely need to be identified as the significant beneficial owner of Zenith Innovations Pvt Ltd. He would need to file a BEN-1 declaration, and the company would need to file a BEN-2 return with the Registrar reflecting his details.

This example shows why SBO compliance is not just a formality for large conglomerates — it applies just as much to a small Indian startup that happens to have a foreign holding company or an investment vehicle in its cap table.

Compliance and filing implications

Ongoing compliance obligations linked to Section 90 include:

• One-time and ongoing assessment: Companies should assess their shareholding structure whenever there is a change — new investment rounds, transfer of shares, restructuring, or entry of new corporate shareholders — to check if new SBOs have emerged or existing SBO details have changed.
• Timely BEN-1 and BEN-2 filings: Once an SBO is identified, the individual must file BEN-1, and the company must file BEN-2 within the timeline prescribed under the rules. Since these timelines are set by rule and have been clarified through circulars, please verify the current filing window.
• Maintaining the SBO register: This register should be updated whenever there is a change in SBO details and should be available for inspection by members and regulators as required.
• Disclosure in annual filings: Companies are generally expected to reflect SBO-related compliance status appropriately in their annual returns and related filings.
• Board and company secretary oversight: Many companies now build SBO review into their annual compliance calendar, alongside other ROC filings, precisely because it is easy to overlook when ownership structures change gradually over time.

Penalties for non-compliance

Non-compliance with Section 90 can attract penalties on the company, its officers in default, and on the individual who fails to make the required SBO declaration. The rules allow for restriction of rights on shares (such as voting or dividend rights) through NCLT intervention when a person does not comply with the company's information request, and separate monetary penalties can apply for the company's or the SBO's failure to make timely declarations or filings.

Since penalty amounts and the scope of restrictions have been subject to amendment, we do not quote specific figures here. Please verify the current penalty provisions under Section 90 and the SBO Rules with a qualified professional, since relying on outdated figures could lead to incorrect compliance planning.

Beyond direct penalties, unresolved SBO non-compliance can also complicate due diligence during fundraising, M&A transactions, or bank loan approvals, since investors and lenders increasingly check SBO compliance as part of their standard checklist.

Recent changes to note

The SBO framework has evolved meaningfully since it was first introduced, including changes to the threshold percentages that trigger SBO status, clarifications on how "significant influence or control" is assessed for trusts, partnership firms, and pooled investment vehicles, and updates to the BEN-1, BEN-2, and BEN-4 forms themselves. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has also issued FAQs and clarifications addressing tricky scenarios such as multi-layered holding structures and foreign shareholders.

Because these thresholds and clarifications are updated periodically, please verify the latest amendments to Section 90 and the SBO Rules before finalizing your company's SBO assessment, particularly if your shareholding structure includes trusts, LLPs, or overseas entities.

Common mistakes

• Assuming SBO rules only apply to large or listed companies, when in fact even small private companies with layered shareholding must comply.
• Ignoring foreign holding company structures on the assumption that Indian rules don't reach overseas entities — the individual behind the foreign entity may still need to be identified.
• Not reassessing SBO status after a funding round that changes the shareholding pattern or introduces new corporate or trust shareholders.
• Confusing "beneficial owner" for tax or FEMA purposes with "significant beneficial owner" under the Companies Act, which has its own distinct tests and thresholds.
• Failing to maintain or update the SBO register even after BEN-2 has been filed once.
• Not sending Form BEN-4 notices when the company has reasonable cause to believe an undisclosed SBO exists.
• Treating the exercise as a one-time checkbox rather than an ongoing monitoring obligation tied to changes in ownership or control.

FAQ

Who is a Significant Beneficial Owner under Section 90?

Broadly, an SBO is an individual who, directly or indirectly (including through other companies, trusts, or partnership firms), holds a significant stake in shares, voting rights, or dividend entitlement above a prescribed threshold, or otherwise exercises significant influence or control over the company, without being the direct registered shareholder. The exact threshold should be verified under the current SBO Rules.

What is Form BEN-1 used for?

Form BEN-1 is the declaration that an individual identified as a significant beneficial owner must file with the company, disclosing the nature and extent of their beneficial interest.

What is Form BEN-2 used for?

Form BEN-2 is the return that the company must file with the Registrar of Companies after receiving a BEN-1 declaration, reporting the SBO's details to the regulator.

Does Section 90 apply to companies with only individual shareholders?

If all shares are held directly by individuals in their own names, with no indirect holding, trust, or corporate layering involved, there may be no SBO to report. However, the company should still document that it assessed its structure and found no SBOs.

What happens if a shareholder refuses to disclose SBO information?

The company can issue a notice in Form BEN-4 seeking the information, and if there is no satisfactory response, the company can apply to the National Company Law Tribunal to restrict rights on the relevant shares, such as voting or dividend rights, until the information is provided.

Are foreign shareholders covered under SBO rules?

Yes, if an Indian company's shares are ultimately held or controlled by an individual through a foreign entity, that individual may need to be identified and disclosed as an SBO, subject to the specific tests under the rules.

How is SBO different from a Director or a registered shareholder?

A director manages the company, and a registered shareholder is the person or entity whose name appears in the share register. An SBO is the real individual who ultimately owns or controls the shares or exercises significant influence, which may or may not be the same as the registered shareholder, especially where shares are held through intermediate entities.

Is SBO compliance a one-time filing or an ongoing obligation?

It is an ongoing obligation. Any change in shareholding, control, or the SBO's particulars should trigger a fresh declaration and updated filing, not just a one-time exercise at incorporation or during the first assessment.

Legal Suvidha's compliance team handles this end-to-end.

Why Founders Choose Legal Suvidha

For 14 years we have taken founders end-to-end — from choosing the right structure and incorporating, to first-year compliance, funding readiness, and ongoing ROC/GST/tax filings — so you never have to switch providers as you grow.

• One team for the whole journey — start, launch, post-launch and every annual filing after.
• Fixed, all-inclusive pricing — professional plus government fees itemised, no hidden charges.
• A dedicated CA/CS who owns your case and does not disappear after payment.
• 6,000+ founders served, 4.9/5 rating, DPIIT-recognised, 100% online.

Talk to a Legal Suvidha expert today for a free consultation and an exact, transparent quote on WhatsApp (8130645164).